Court Dismisses Drake's Lawsuit Over Kendrick Lamar’s Hit Diss Track
A court official has dismissed the rapper Drake’s defamation lawsuit targeting the music corporation concerning Kendrick Lamar's song Not Like Us.
Judge Jeannette Vargas decided that Lamar's song lyrics, which accused the artist and his associates of being "pedophiles", were "protected opinion" and could not be considered libelous.
The Canadian rapper submitted the lawsuit in early this year, claiming Universal Music Group, the music company behind both artists, of defamation by permitting the song to be published and promoted, stating it spread a "untrue and harmful story".
The artist’s representative stated he intended to challenge the decision. UMG said it was satisfied with the outcome and was eager to resuming its work with the rapper.
Context of the Hip-Hop Feud
The diss song, which was first dropped in spring 2024, was broadly viewed as the decisive blow in an continuing feud between the competing artists.
It has become the biggest hit of Lamar's career, having won multiple Grammy awards and being one of the most-talked about highlights of his Super Bowl half-time show in February.
In a detailed ruling, Judge Vargas called the row between the rappers "the most infamous rap battle in the history of rap music".
"Both rappers’ series of diss tracks was a 'verbal conflict' that was the focus of extensive press coverage and online discourse," the judge wrote.
"Although the accusation that plaintiff is a pedophile is undoubtedly a serious one, the wider backdrop of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and offensive accusations exchanged by each artist, would not incline the reasonable listener to believe that 'Not Like Us' imparts truthful statements about plaintiff."
She additionally observed that, in an earlier song, the artist had "dared Lamar to make the pedophile claims" that appeared in the diss record.
On the track his own release, the rapper used the synthetic vocals of the late rapper to give Lamar advice on how to prevail in the feud.
"Talk about him likin' young girls, that's a gift from me," the track proposed.
"It is in this context in which such lyrics as 'Say, Drake, I hear you like 'em young' must be evaluated," stated Judge Vargas.
"The parallel in the wording strongly indicates that this lyric is a clear reference to the artist’s own words in the earlier release."
'A Slap in the Face to Creatives'
Drake, whose legal name is Aubrey Drake Graham, did not sue Lamar in the legal filing.
His legal team accused UMG of initiating "a campaign to generate a viral hit" out of a track that made the "false factual allegation that the artist is a criminal paedophile, and to imply that the public should turn to vigilante justice in response".
Ruling against the plaintiff, the judge said fans would not expect "accurate factual reporting" from a musical attack "replete with profanity, insults, violent implications, and figurative and hyperbolic language."
She highlighted that Drake himself had engaged in similar language, referencing a lyric in which the star "heavily" suggested that "Lamar is a domestic abuser", and a separate instance where he "claims that he 'was told' that one of his rival’s children may not be biologically his."
Concerning Lamar's song, the court said: "Although apparent statements of fact may take on the nature of subjective views... when made in public debate, intense arguments, or other circumstances in which an listener may anticipate the use of slurs, fiery rhetoric or exaggeration."
Responding to the rejection, a UMG spokesperson said: "From the outset, this lawsuit was an insult to every creative and their creative expression and never should have seen the light of day."
"We are satisfied with the court's dismissal and look forward to resuming our work effectively promoting the artist’s work and investing in his career," the representative continued.
A representative for the musician said the artist intended to contest the decision, "and we look forward to the Court of Appeals reviewing it".
Kendrick Lamar has not yet comment on the case.